The true nature of ‘desired objects’
Continued from previous part
It is hence imperative for the Sadhaka (the spiritual seeker) to analyse and realise the true utility of the desired objects.
But how can objects that do have utility be ignored?
This query can be raised at this juncture as to how an object with utility can be ignored as being inconsequential or worthless. The answer lies in the fact that the worthiness and utility are not naturally inherent in objects. They are but concepts related to the perceiver.
For instance, sweet items may be liked by some. Yet, the very same sweet items may be regarded as fit to be abandoned by diabetics. Is then a sweet item naturally likeable or dislikeable? It is neither, for likeability and distastefulness are merely conceptions associated with it by persons.
Such being the case, there is nothing inappropriate in conceiving an object, which we now consider likeable and worthwhile, as being insignificant and sans utility. In fact, such a conception leads to tranquility of mind.
This is because an object longed for causes grief due to considerations of possible non-acquisition, while an acquired object causes due to fear of possible separation from it. For instance, the trouble associated with acquisition of wealth is well-known. Likewise, acquired wealth is also a source of worry, for one fears its loss in part or full by way of theft, or taxation etc.
Such a realization can be had for every object of consideration. The Sadhaka must hence be open to realizing the futility of possessions and objects that may seem necessary and useful in the immediate present, and continue to nurture contentment and detachment.
« The means to removal of desires —
The importance of ‘Time’ »
Go to Top
